2024 Annual Report: Meeting the Moment and Protecting Our Democracy

A MESSAGE FROM OUR CO-CEOs

With the reelection of Donald Trump, our civil and constitutional rights are under threat. As every day brings fresh horrors — including corruption, attacks on free expression and attempts to erase our country’s history — Free Press is doing everything it can to combat the country’s slide toward authoritarianism. We’re taking on the self-serving billionaires — from Elon Musk to Mark Zuckerberg and Jeff Bezos — whose media and tech empires have put our democracy at risk. And in this perilous moment, Free Press is working harder than ever to combat hate and authoritarianism and fight for the kind of journalism that gives people the news and information they need to thrive.

As Free Press enters its third decade, we remain committed to our mission of promoting a just and equitable media system that serves a multiracial democracy. Your generous support keeps Free Press and our sister organization, Free Press Action, independent from the government, political parties and the industries we track — and allows us to work solely for the public interest. Read on to learn what you helped us accomplish in 2024.

Onward,

Craig Aaron and Jessica J. González

CELEBRATING OUR 20TH ANNIVERSARY

In March, Free Press marked two decades of wins at a gathering in Washington, D.C., that brought together current and former colleagues, allies and policymakers. Speakers included Free Press co-founder John Nichols, former Federal Communications Commissioner Michael Copps, Federal Communications Commissioner Anna Gomez and Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter. Free Press board members Brandi Collins-Dexter, Martha Fuentes-Bautista and Victor Pickard also shared remarks.

“We were created to give people a voice in the decisions that shape our media system,” said Co-CEO Jessica J. González. “I’m proud of the work we’ve done over the past 20 years to make sure that more people can participate in the marketplace of ideas, to ensure that everyone can share their stories online, to improve local journalism, to hold online platforms accountable for spreading hate and lies, to call out racism and corporate greed in the media industry, and to envision a better way.”

COMBATING HATE AND LIES IN TECH

In September, a Free Press-led coalition of civil-rights, media-advocacy and tech-accountability groups announced the launch of Democracy Is, an initiative that called on media and tech companies to prioritize truth over sensationalism, accountability over profits and democracy over division. The project trained journalists on how to cover extremism and helped members of the public identify and combat disinformation on social media. Democracy Is released multiple resources, including a guide to how people can protect their First Amendment right to protest and recommendations on how newsrooms can address electoral disinformation. The initiative also held a series of events, including one on risks confronting communities during the election cycle.

“Democracy Is was founded on the premise that people power can disrupt institutional failings,” said Nora Benavidez, senior counsel and director of digital justice and civil rights. “We have brought together organizations with core recommendations that both media and tech companies should take to protect users and give people the information they need to participate fully in their communities and our democracy.”

In the fall, far-right leaders used dehumanizing language and spread hateful disinformation about Haitian communities in Ohio and Pennsylvania, leading to people being targeted and harassed. In addition, false information targeted at Spanish speakers proliferated over social media. As part of the Democracy Is initiative, Free Press and the Latino Media Collaborative held a webinar, “Challenging Election Lies Targeting Latinos & Immigrants,” which highlighted how people can push back on racist narratives.

In April, a Free Press-led global coalition of more than 200 civil-society organizations, researchers and journalists called on the biggest social-media platforms to strengthen their efforts to protect democratic elections worldwide in 2024. The coalition urged these companies to take six steps — including reinstating election-integrity policies and staffing up critical trust and safety teams — to curb misinformation. “Social-media companies must redouble their election-integrity efforts as generative AI has the potential to supercharge hate and lies that endanger democracy and public safety,” said Jessica J. González.

At a time when social-media platforms are trying to avoid any kind of public accountability, eight of the 12 companies responded to our demands with some commitments to election-integrity measures —  such as beefing up their non-English-language content-moderation efforts, flagging generative AI that aims to confuse or misinform people, and applying their rules equally to VIP accounts.

Free Press then released Democracy Deferred: Social-Media Companies’ Meager Commitments to Election Integrity in 2024, an analysis of these responses. The report, which Nora Benavidez and Jessica J. Gonzàlez wrote, assesses these platforms’ readiness to address political disinformation, manipulation and hate on their networks. The analysis exposes how social-media platforms came up short in their plans to protect users and stem eroding trust in democratic institutions. Democracy Deferred also sets forth a roadmap for how these companies can better protect voters, platform users and democracies everywhere.

In July, Free Press Action organized a Capitol Hill briefing where Jessica joined Sens. Ben Ray Luján and Alex Padilla to highlight the crisis of election disinformation in non-English languages — and to issue an urgent call for social-media platforms to beef up content moderation across all languages.

In August, a Free Press-led coalition of more than three-dozen civil-rights, consumer-rights and journalism organizations released a letter calling on news outlets to accurately and unapologetically report on U.S. elections and the state of our democracy. The letter describes best practices the media should adhere to during moments of crisis, violence and threats — and calls on newsrooms to place protection of our democracy over their own bottom lines. 

In November, Free Press left Twitter — now the go-to platform for white supremacists, conspiracy theorists and other extremists. Elon Musk’s reckless oversight of the platform has endangered people on the receiving end of his abuse and threatened our democracy. 

Since the election, billionaire tech owners have abandoned even more user-safety protections as they’ve curried favor with Trump. The CEOs of Amazon, Google, Meta and Open AI made million-dollar donations to Trump’s inauguration fund, earning second-row seats at the ceremony alongside Musk. Free Press immediately started calling attention to how media and tech leaders are supporting Trump’s assault on free expression — and we won’t stop fighting his authoritarian takeover of our media system.

HOLDING FCC CHAIRMAN CARR ACCOUNTABLE

Ever since he became an FCC commissioner in 2017, Free Press has called out Brendan Carr for refusing to serve the public interest on everything ranging from Net Neutrality to exploitative prison-phone services. In 2024, Free Press Action exposed his Project 2025 connections — noting that he was the only sitting government official to write a chapter in the far-right policy roadmap. “There are serious ethical concerns about a sitting commissioner participating in Project 2025, with no clear lines as to where Carr’s government role ends and his role as a private citizen working in his ‘personal capacity’ begins,” wrote Co-CEO Craig Aaron.

We also documented how Carr auditioned for the job of FCC chairman, desperate to gain Trump’s attention and show his willingness to bend the rules and twist the law to serve the administration. That included attacking the First Amendment at every opportunity. In the fall, Carr falsely claimed that then-Vice President Kamala Harris’ brief Saturday Night Live appearance had violated the agency’s equal-time rule. He also attacked CBS’ 60 Minutes for airing an edited interview with Harris and refused to speak out when Trump threatened to take away the broadcast licenses of TV stations for daring to fact check him during the campaign. Carr is trying to scare journalists into silence — and we will continue to defend dissenting voices and protect their right to speak.

Holding Carr accountable is one of Free Press’ priorities for 2025. In a post-election Op-Ed for The Hill, Jessica J. González condemned Carr for the radical plans he outlined in Project 2025: “Carr argued for a dramatic expansion of the FCC’s authority so it can regulate the speech of social-media platforms. In addition to banning TikTok, Carr wants to strip social-media companies of their rights to moderate content, which would force them to host toxic racism, misogyny and other forms of hatred that are unpopular with advertisers and the public alike.”

UNDERSTANDING PUBLIC VIEWS ON MEDIA AND TECH

In May, Free Press released the findings from a nationwide poll, which gauged public attitudes about media and technology in an election year. This survey shows that people in the United States believe the media system is failing to meet the civic needs of a functioning democracy. People are also highly concerned about privacy and their ability to access reliable and trustworthy information on local, national and global affairs. The poll, which Free Press commissioned and the African American Research Collaborative and BSP Research conducted, surveyed 3,000 people across the country. The survey oversampled AAPI, Black and Latino populations, allowing for a more detailed analysis of the usage and impact of old and new communications technology on people of color.

According to our findings, only 28 percent of all adults say they feel “very well informed” when voting in local elections. We also learned that 79 percent of people from across the racial and political spectrum are concerned that the information they’re seeing online is false, fake or a deliberate attempt to confuse. Meanwhile, 76 percent are concerned about encountering election misinformation, and 52 percent support increasing public funding to expand local and independent news — in other words, the kind of reporting that could debunk lies and propaganda.

In July, Free Press released an in-depth analysis of our findings about daily Spanish speakers. Our polling shows that Spanish speakers in the United States are even more likely than others to feel they do not have enough independent news sources to make informed voting decisions. The poll indicates that daily Spanish speakers are more likely to experience the negative impacts of online misinformation, affirming years of research that finds Latinos are ripe targets for bad actors.

These results continue to inform our approaches to educating people about the free-speech, human-rights and journalism crises before us.

THWARTING ATTACKS ON NONPROFITS

In the fall, Free Press Action helped lead opposition to the Stop Terror-Financing and Tax Penalties on American Hostages Act, a bill whose misleading name cloaked its true intention: undermining free speech and crushing dissent. The legislation would give the executive branch broad powers to revoke the tax-exempt status of a nonprofit group by merely claiming that it is a “terrorist supporting organization.”

The possibility for abuse with this kind of legislation is immense. It would enable the government to intimidate and punish nonprofit newsrooms that are working to hold leaders accountable — as well as any nonprofit groups that have angered the Trump administration.

Free Press Action and other groups mobilized tens of thousands of people to urge their representatives to reject the bill — which failed on an initial vote that required a two-thirds majority to pass. After the House speaker brought back the bill, we redoubled our efforts and persuaded dozens of lawmakers who had voted “yes” on the first vote to vote “no” on the second.

While the House passed the bill by a narrow majority, we succeeded in stopping Senate leaders from bringing it up for a vote. Free Press Action will fight back if Republicans reintroduce the bill in 2025.

PROTECTING PRIVACY AND CIVIL RIGHTS — AND CONFRONTING AI ABUSES

In February, Free Press Action and a coalition of privacy, civil-rights and digital-rights groups sent thousands of constituent phone calls and petitions calling on lawmakers to cancel a floor vote to extend controversial surveillance powers under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The pressure worked, and House leaders shelved the bill.

Unfortunately, leaders brought the bill back for a vote in April, when it passed despite the public outcry. Section 702 will come up for another reauthorization in two years, and we will keep working to stop spying agencies from abusing people’s civil liberties and civil rights.

“This unconstitutional authority allows intelligence agencies to continue to sift through personal data even when those searches don’t relate to a warranted criminal investigation,” said Vice President of Policy and General Counsel Matt Wood. “This is an especially grave concern because recent administrations, both Republican and Democratic alike, have unjustly targeted people of color and political dissidents.”

Since 2021, Free Press Action has been urging Congress to pass the Fourth Amendment Is Not for Sale Act, which would restrict law enforcement and intelligence agencies from purchasing data on people in the United States without a warrant. Since the fall of Roe v. Wade — and the criminalization of abortion in more than 20 states — this practice is more dangerous than ever. In April, the House passed this bipartisan bill — the farthest the legislation has ever advanced.

“The privacy violations that flow from law-enforcement entities circumventing the Fourth Amendment undermine civil liberties, free expression and our ability to control what happens to our data,” said Advocacy Director Jenna Ruddock. “These impacts affect everyone who uses digital platforms that extract our personal information any time we open a browser or visit social media and other websites — even when we go to events like demonstrations and other places with our phones revealing our locations.”

Free Press has long urged the Federal Trade Commission to use its own authority to protect people’s private information. In December, the FTC began the process of banning three companies from using or selling people’s sensitive location data — including data on everyone from racial-justice protesters to pregnant people visiting health-care facilities.

At the Take Back Tech conference, Jenna Ruddock presented her research about the environmental impacts of data centers and their role in facilitating surveillance. As the growth of AI intensifies, we’re forging alliances with groups mobilizing against the harmful consequences of these centers.

Free Press helps lead the Athena Data Center Working Group, a subset of the broader Athena Coalition. In October, the working group called on the National Telecommunications and Information Administration to consider how data centers threaten to exacerbate climate change — and urged the NTIA to reject unchecked expansion of these facilities.

AI models and algorithms are built and trained on decades of institutionalized discrimination and segregation. They perpetuate biases that create inequitable experiences for users. In September, Free Press Action supported the introduction of a bill, the Artificial Intelligence Civil Rights Act, that would help eliminate these kinds of biases from AI tools.

“Artificial intelligence is rapidly entering every corner of our lives — from access to education, health care and insurance to decisions made by the courts, police and immigration officials — with far too little public input or recourse when these systems cause real-world bias or harm,” said Craig Aaron, who spoke during a press conference about the bill alongside Sen. Ed Markey and civil-rights leaders. “We need to ensure that new tools and technologies aren’t used to exacerbate discrimination.”

DEFENDING TIKTOK USERS’ FIRST AMENDMENT RIGHTS

In April, then-President Biden cited security concerns when signing into law a bill that would force TikTok’s Chinese owner, ByteDance, to divest its holdings of the site or face a ban in the United States. The law does nothing to protect people’s privacy or address the widespread manipulation users face across all platforms, including those owned and headquartered in the United States. Free Press Action asserts that instead of banning TikTok, lawmakers should pass a comprehensive federal privacy law that limits how all of these companies collect, store, analyze and sell our personal data. We joined an amicus brief arguing that the law violates the First Amendment by restricting Americans’ right to access information and media from abroad.

Unfortunately, in early 2025 the Supreme Court upheld the TikTok ban. “Selling TikTok to a U.S. owner will do little to placate national-security concerns in a data marketplace that has few restrictions against the repackaging and sale of user information to the highest bidders, including foreign interests,” said Legal Director Yanni Chen. “As with repressive laws from oppressive regimes around the world, the real toll of the ban will be on everyday people, many of whom use the platform to organize communities and express views that legacy media often ignore.”

TikTok’s future in the United States remains uncertain, and we will keep fighting for solutions that protect platform users.

WINNING (AND LOSING) NET NEUTRALITY

In April, Free Press celebrated a huge milestone when the FCC restored the Net Neutrality rules the first Trump administration had overturned. The agency also reinstated its Title II authority, giving it the power to protect people from internet service providers’ privacy invasions, promote broadband competition and deployment, and take action against hidden junk fees, data caps and billing rip-offs.

This victory was years in the making, and our team worked hard to ensure the FCC’s order covered all the bases and closed all the loopholes. “Public support for Net Neutrality is overwhelming, and people understand why we need a federal watchdog to protect everyone’s access to the most essential communications platform of our time,” said Craig Aaron. “This is what democracy should look like: public servants responding to public sentiment, taking steps to protect just and reasonable services and free expression, and showing that the government is capable of defending the public interest.”

Almost immediately, industry groups sued to block the FCC’s restored rules. Free Press went to court to fight back: In September, we filed a brief with the 6th Circuit Court of Appeals alongside several allies in defense of the rules.

Unfortunately, in early 2025 the court ruled against the FCC — delivering a big win to industry. “With this ruling, the 6th Circuit has for now denied the public the internet access service that it deserves — one that is affordable, reliable, safe, accessible, and free from unlawful discrimination,” said Matt Wood. “Despite this setback, Free Press will continue to fight — in the courts, in Congress and everywhere — for an open, fair and free communications network for all.”

Free Press has appealed the 6th Circuit’s decision, and will also look to the states to hold the line, with laws like California’s strong Net Neutrality regulations still on the books. And we’ll continue to expose internet service providers when they gouge, manipulate or discriminate against their users.

CLOSING THE DIGITAL DIVIDE

Through both groundbreaking research and ongoing advocacy, Free Press Action has pushed decision-makers to recognize the need to make high-speed internet both affordable and available to everyone. In 2021, our work paved the way for the historic $65-billion investment in broadband in the infrastructure package that then-President Biden signed into law.

A remarkable $14.2 billion of that total was dedicated to the creation of the Federal Communications Commission’s Affordable Connectivity Program. The ACP, which launched in 2022, gave households living near the poverty line or enrolled in other federal-aid programs up to $30 per month for the internet package of their choosing — and $75 per month for people living on Tribal lands. Nearly 23 million households — which translates to 1-in-6 U.S. households — enrolled in the ACP.

There was a huge need for this program but the funding for it was limited. In 2024, Free Press Action advocated for Rep. Yvette Clarke’s Affordable Connectivity Program Extension Act, which would have kept families connected through the end of the year. We helped mobilize a coalition of 271 civil-society groups and local, state and Tribal governments to express their support for the bill. While a bipartisan majority of House representatives expressed support for the legislation, House leaders refused to bring it up for a floor vote. As a result, the ACP expired — adding more financial pressure to families already struggling to make ends meet, and disrupting internet access for many. Free Press Action is continuing to push for remedies — including long-term sustainability for the ACP — to this chronic broadband-affordability problem.

In September, Reps. Rashida Tlaib, Cori Bush and Jamaal Bowman reintroduced the Utility Justice Human Rights Resolution, which declares that access to broadband, water, power, heating and cooling are human rights. The resolution is the product of work with the Utility Justice Coalition, which Free Press Action helps lead.

“Equitable access to affordable and reliable high-speed internet, power and water is a necessity for people to survive and thrive,” said Senior Campaign Director Heather Franklin. “In the face of compounding existential crises, including human-driven climate change, no one — no matter who they are or where they live — should have to worry about their ability to call for help, communicate with loved ones, or safely turn on the lights or faucet.”

ORGANIZING FOR MEDIA REPARATIONS AND CULTURAL REPAIR

Anshantia Oso, a renowned activist and strategist, joined Free Press in July to lead the Media 2070 team. For over a decade, she has mobilized thousands of advocates across the country on issues ranging from migrant rights to racial justice to public arts policy.

In October, Media 2070 and partners Brandi Collins-Dexter, MediaJustice and Black River Life brought the Black Future Newsstand to Chicago. This custom-built art installation — which debuted in Harlem in 2023 – invites people to consider the question “What does a media that loves Black people look, feel and sound like in a future where reparations are real?” Exploring the relationship between news, politics, racial narratives and the potential for creating a true democracy, the installation showcased Black-owned magazines, art and newspapers alongside coverage of Chicago’s political movements of the ’70s and ’80s.

Presented as part of Race Forward’s Cultural Week of Action on Race and Democracy, Black Future Newsstand Chicago also included a panel discussion on the harms of pro-police propaganda. Media 2070 co-founder Joseph Torres presented his research on Chicago’s history of racism and efforts to facilitate repair. Media 2070 will bring the exhibit to Los Angeles in spring 2025.

In September, Media 2070 began a research project with the Charlotta Bass Journalism & Justice Lab at USC Annenberg, which studies and shares news stories and oral histories about Black social-justice trailblazers on the West Coast. The project is researching both harmful and reparative news narratives concerning Black life and identity in Los Angeles. This research will contribute to a multimedia archive, “From Riot to Repair: Community Archives on Media and Narrative Power.” 

To kick off the collaboration, Media 2070’s Diamond Hardiman and Venneikia Williams gave a series of lectures to undergraduate and graduate journalism students at USC. The Bass Lab has also partnered with Media 2070 on two new courses focused on helping students examine race, justice and reparative journalism. And in the spring, Media 2070 will return to Los Angeles to unveil the research project’s findings.

Media 2070 has continued to shape the national debate about the need for media reparations. The team is also forging international connections to strengthen its fight for media reparations. Diamond and Venneikia traveled to Ghana to take part in a gathering featuring artists, civil-society leaders, narrative strategists and reparations leaders from around the world. Participants created strategies in the spheres of journalism, organizing and philanthropy. Anshantia attended the Web Summit in Portugal with a delegation of people focused on the intersection between media, tech and gender justice.

CRAFTING JOURNALISM POLICY

Since 2004, California has lost 25 percent of its newspapers, and many ethnic media outlets and nonprofit newsrooms are struggling to stay afloat. For the past two years, Free Press Action has been hard at work in the state to pass policies that will support community-centered newsrooms and keep people informed. But in late August, state lawmakers announced they had cut a deal with Google, hammered out behind closed doors, that sold both California’s communities and journalists short. While some newsrooms will benefit from this deal in the short term, it’s not a viable long-term solution.

Prior to this disappointing development, Free Press Action had rallied support behind a state Senate bill that would have imposed a fee on major tech platforms to help support the production of local news. The revenue generated by this fee, estimated to be roughly $500 million, would have given outlets an employment tax credit to cover a portion of employees’ wages. Thanks in part to Free Press Action’s support, the bill passed the state Senate in June. But in exchange for Google’s commitments, lawmakers shelved this legislation.

On a brighter note, we stopped a terrible bill — the California Journalism Preservation Act — from moving forward. The CJPA would have rewarded the media conglomerates and hedge funds that have destroyed local news and made it harder for small community-centered newsrooms to survive. We worked with other advocacy groups, small publishers and community leaders to raise awareness about the bill’s many harms and prevented it from getting a vote. And on another bright note, Gov. Newsom signed into law a measure that takes first steps to boost state agencies’ advertising spending in outlets that serve diverse populations. Our ally Latino Media Collaborative advocated for this measure, which Free Press Action supported. Moving forward, Free Press Action will continue to urge lawmakers in California and elsewhere to put community publishers, ethnic media outlets and nonprofit newsrooms at the center of any legislation.

In 2024, Free Press Action expanded its journalism team and extended its policy work to the Great Lakes region, with an initial focus on Illinois and Wisconsin. In January, Journalism Program Manager Alex Frandsen took part in a press conference introducing a trio of promising journalism bills in Wisconsin. This legislation would support existing news outlets, sustain reporting jobs and invest in the future of media across the state. And in May, the Illinois legislature passed the Save Community Act, which included employment tax credits, scholarships for early-career journalists and transparency measures for out-of-state companies buying local-news outlets in the state. These proposals originated from a task force the legislature convened. Free Press Action staff were interviewed as part of the task force’s work and contributed research and analysis.

Since 2021, the New Jersey Civic Information Consortium — which we helped create and continue to guide — has awarded grants to some 30 organizations focused on diversifying journalism, improving government transparency, providing community-health news and better serving communities of color and immigrant communities. Senior Director of Journalism and Civic Information Mike Rispoli serves on the consortium’s board, and Journalism and Media Education Director Vanessa Maria Graber joined the Strategic Planning Committee, which helped the nonprofit set a vision and priorities. The state allocated $3 million for the consortium in the 2025 budget.

The Media Power Collaborative, which Free Press launched in 2022, brings together hundreds of media workers, movement organizers and researchers to develop and win transformative journalism policies. The MPC held a full slate of gatherings in 2024, including an International Labor Day event where panelists discussed how community members and journalism workers can collaborate to structurally transform local journalism. A new policy tracker on the MPC website maps the bills under consideration in states across the country. In early 2025, the network released a comprehensive policy agenda that will guide its future work. This roadmap for community-centered news calls on lawmakers to treat local news like the public good it is.

CREATING JUST AND EQUITABLE LOCAL NEWS

In Philadelphia, Free Press is working to transform coverage of public safety, crime and trauma. While speaking at the Crime Coverage Summit in January, News Voices: Philadelphia Program Manager Cassie Owens said, “While we as journalists often think of our work as neutral, the evidence is showing that the impacts on the communities and on the people in the stories are not actually neutral.” 

In 2024, Free Press launched the Public Safety Coverage Cohort, a group of local journalists, media-makers and community organizers in Philadelphia that is working to change how we talk about public safety in the media. The group’s monthly meetings have included an ongoing harm-reduction series and a grief-care workshop with local storytellers. This workshop grew out of community gatherings we held in 2023, where therapists and organizers noted that grief care could benefit community members experiencing harm from crime coverage. The cohort is now in the process of creating a code of ethics for covering public safety. In 2024, we also began a partnership with two local organizations invested in telling honest stories about youth in Philadelphia. And the New Jersey Community Media Collaborative — which Free Press and allies established in 2020 — received funding to support public-health media projects in underserved locations.

Free Press began the Reparative Journalism Project in 2023 with an educational video that delved into the journalism industry’s history of harming Black and Indigenous communities. In April 2024, we released the second video in this series, “What Journalists Can Learn from Global Repair Movements,” which explores what reporters and storytellers can learn from movements that have responded to centuries of violence, theft and oppression. In December, we released the third video, “Reparative Journalism: The Healing Power of Storytelling,” which features interviews with two Black journalists working to uplift community voices and repair harm. The team is now developing a reparative-journalism curriculum aimed at journalism professors, students and newsroom leaders.

In 2024, Free Press launched the Civic Journalism Research Project, which will produce case studies of effective civic-media models. The result will be a guide that elevates best practices for civic media among newsrooms, promotes promising models and cultivates public support for quality local journalism. 

Vanessa Maria Graber moderated a two-part panel discussion on environmental journalism that Free Press, the Center for Cooperative Media and the New Jersey League of Conservation Voters hosted. Participants heard from environmental-justice organizers and journalists about water and air-quality issues, flooding, natural disasters and how environmental racism impacts the health of New Jerseyans. Panelists shared information about potential policy solutions and discussed how journalists can be a force for good amid these challenges.

As our polling shows, daily Spanish speakers in the United States are concerned about the twin problems of dwindling local news and the prevalence of false information online. Through appearances at SRCCON and other conferences, Vanessa Maria highlighted the need to give Latinx communities the trustworthy and accessible information they need about elections, government policies, public resources and other crucial matters. 

PROTECTING PUBLIC MEDIA AND DIVERSIFYING MEDIA OWNERSHIP 

Every couple of years, there are partisan attempts to root out alleged “bias” at NPR and PBS — which remain incredibly popular and trusted among the American public — and slash funding that supports local nonprofit radio and TV affiliates nationwide. In May, Free Press Action’s Craig Aaron testified before a House committee about the need to safeguard public media and reject these attacks. Defunding threats don’t just harm NPR executives — they endanger the work of more than 1,000 local radio stations providing essential information to communities large and small. His testimony helped head off a funding threat.

In November, we raised an outcry upon learning that Elon Musk’s so-called “Department of Government Efficiency” aims to zero out funding at the Corporation for Public Broadcasting. “The Trump purge of federal spending is not just about downsizing the government so billionaires like Musk will have no obligation to pay their fair share in taxes,” wrote Senior Director of Strategy and Communications Timothy Karr. “It’s about stripping our democratic system of all accountability mechanisms, including the sorts of journalism that hold our country’s rich and powerful responsible for their misdeeds.”

In September, Free Press and several allies filed a brief defending the Federal Communications Commission’s broadcast-ownership rules against an industry challenge in the Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals. A series of deregulatory decisions the agency has made over the last two decades has significantly pared back these rules, which makes it even more crucial to preserve the remaining ones. “For broadcasting to remain a source of diverse and truly local content — serving populations that national and homogenized news sources so often ignore — the Federal Communications Commission must retain its rules preventing a single company from dominating the airwaves or owning quite literally every broadcast outlet in the same city,” said Matt Wood.

GETTING THE WORD OUT

We had more than 2,400 press hits in 2024 in outlets including the Associated Press, The Guardian, La Opinión, Mother Jones, The New York Times, The New Yorker, NBC News, NPR and The Washington Post. We published 25 Op-Eds in outlets including CNN and The Seattle Times.

To join our community online and stay up to date on our work, you can follow Free Press on Bluesky, Facebook, Instagram, Threads and TikTok.

FUND THE FIGHT

Your generosity makes our work possible. Please give what you can today to make sure we have the resources we need to push for equitable media and tech policies that improve people’s lives. We’re actively fundraising to meet our budget goals and to ensure we’re here to fight for your rights to connect and communicate in the future. You can give with confidence knowing that Free Press and Free Press Action do not accept money from business, government or political parties.

You can support us by making a one-time or monthly donation below or by mailing a check to P.O. Box 60238, Florence, MA 01062. You can also make a contribution through a donor-advised fund, a gift of stocks or securities, or a planned gift. For more information, please visit other ways to give or reach out to us.

Support our research, public education and organizing work in Washington and across the United States. Gifts to Free Press are tax deductible as allowed by law.

Help us mobilize direct and grassroots advocacy efforts that oppose or support specific federal or state policies or legislation and advance the public interest. Gifts to Free Press Action are not tax deductible.

Thank you!

ABOUT US

Free Press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. We seek to change the media to transform democracy to realize a just society. Learn more about our mission.

Our amazing staff of organizers, lawyers, strategists, storytellers, researchers and advocates is 39 people strong. We’re building an organization that can bring to life a media system that supports a just and multiracial democracy. Learn more about our staff and board.

Please note: We will post financial information for 2024 when it becomes available in spring 2025.

Free Press and Free Press Action are nonpartisan organizations fighting for your rights to connect and communicate. Free Press and Free Press Action do not support or oppose any candidate for public office.