Press Release
AOL’s Attempt to 'Bribe' Non-Profits Backfires
Contact: Timothy Karr, 201-533-8838
Despite AOL's attempt to divide its critics, the DearAOL.com Coalition announced today it has grown tenfold from 50 organizations to more than 500 as it fights AOL's controversial plan to create a two-tiered Internet that leaves the little guy behind.
Last week, AOL's proposed "email tax" came under fire from a coalition of political groups on the left and right, businesses and non-profits, charities, and Internet advocacy organizations. More than 400 publications around the world published articles about AOL's plan to allow large mass-emailers to pay to bypass AOL's spam filters and get guaranteed delivery directly into the inboxes of AOL customers – leaving the little guy behind with increasingly unreliable second-tier Internet service.
In just several days, the DearAOL.com Coalition grew to include everything from babysitting co-ops to pony clubs, from farmers markets to biker dailies, from Hawaiian skateboard makers to church groups -- demonstrating that small, large, ordinary and extraordinary groups depend on free email delivery. All coalition members are located at www.dearaol.com.
Clearly worried by the coalition's growing momentum, AOL on Friday tried to deceive the public and media into believing AOL was being responsive. They repackaged their already existing "Enhanced Whitelist" as if it were a new program for nonprofits and tried to divide the coalition with an offer to give special email privileges to some "qualified" nonprofits while leaving other non-profits, charities, small businesses, and even neighbors with community mailing lists behind.
"I don't take bribes," said Gilles Frydman, Executive Director of the Association of Cancer Online Resources, a free nonprofit online service for cancer patients. "The solution is not AOL offering a few of us service for free in exchange for our silence – the solution is preserving equal access to the free and open Internet for everyone."
If anything, the net result of AOL's Friday announcement was that they accidentally conceded the central point of the DearAOL.com Coalition.
"By offering to move a few of the little guys from the losers circle to the winners circle, AOL conceded the broader point of our coalition—that AOL's would create a two-tiered Internet that leaves many behind with inferior service," said Adam Green, a spokesperson for MoveOn.org Civic Action.
This weekend, the San Jose Mercury News exposed this reality in an editorial entitled, "Paid e-mail will lead to separate, unequal systems; free systems will become neglected." It identified AOL's threat to the "free and open" Internet this way:
"The Internet giant announced that in the next 30 days it would launch a certified e-mail system that would guarantee delivery for e-mail senders who paid the equivalent of an electronic postage stamp. Those who don't pay could face a greater risk of having their mail tripped up by AOL's spam filters. ...
"[AOL's pay-to-send system] is likely to work as an incentive for AOL to move as many senders as possible to the paid system…the temptation would be to neglect the free e-mail system, whose reliability would decline. Eventually, everyone would migrate to the fee-based system. There would be no way around the AOL tollbooth. ...
"Why doesn't AOL announce it will forgo the fees -- a decision that would help silence critics? AOL won't say...The charge per e-mail is also worrisome. The costs of certifying a sender are largely fixed. So the only reason to keep charging a sender who's already been vetted is to turn e-mail into a cash cow.
Click here to read the full article.
"Perversely, AOL's pay-to-send system would actually reward AOL financially for degrading free email for regular customers as they attempt to push people into paid-mail," said Danny O'Brien, Activism Coordinator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "AOL should be working to ensure its spam filters don't block legitimate mail, not charging protection money to bypass those filters and offering band-aids to allow some select nonprofits to bypass them as well."
Last week, the coalition – representing over 15 million people combined – announced an "Open Letter To AOL" at www.DearAOL.com urging AOL not to implement an "email tax" that would harm Internet freedom. Over 500 organizations and 30,000 everyday Internet users have signed this letter. Coalition members include Craigslist founder Craig Newmark, the Association of Cancer Online Resources, the AFL-CIO, MoveOn.org Civic Action, Gun Owners of America, the Electronic Freedom Foundation, Free Press, and others.
"AOL's pay-to-send scheme threatens the free and open Internet as we know it," said Timothy Karr, campaign director of Free Press, a national, nonpartisan media reform organization. "The Internet needs to be a level playing field. The flow of online information, innovation and ideas is not a luxury to be sold off to the highest bidder."
The DearAOL.com Coalition is engaged in an ongoing large-scale public awareness campaign about the threat AOL's email tax poses to the free and open Internet. More information and a list of all coalition members are located at www.dearaol.com.
Last week, AOL's proposed "email tax" came under fire from a coalition of political groups on the left and right, businesses and non-profits, charities, and Internet advocacy organizations. More than 400 publications around the world published articles about AOL's plan to allow large mass-emailers to pay to bypass AOL's spam filters and get guaranteed delivery directly into the inboxes of AOL customers – leaving the little guy behind with increasingly unreliable second-tier Internet service.
In just several days, the DearAOL.com Coalition grew to include everything from babysitting co-ops to pony clubs, from farmers markets to biker dailies, from Hawaiian skateboard makers to church groups -- demonstrating that small, large, ordinary and extraordinary groups depend on free email delivery. All coalition members are located at www.dearaol.com.
Clearly worried by the coalition's growing momentum, AOL on Friday tried to deceive the public and media into believing AOL was being responsive. They repackaged their already existing "Enhanced Whitelist" as if it were a new program for nonprofits and tried to divide the coalition with an offer to give special email privileges to some "qualified" nonprofits while leaving other non-profits, charities, small businesses, and even neighbors with community mailing lists behind.
"I don't take bribes," said Gilles Frydman, Executive Director of the Association of Cancer Online Resources, a free nonprofit online service for cancer patients. "The solution is not AOL offering a few of us service for free in exchange for our silence – the solution is preserving equal access to the free and open Internet for everyone."
If anything, the net result of AOL's Friday announcement was that they accidentally conceded the central point of the DearAOL.com Coalition.
"By offering to move a few of the little guys from the losers circle to the winners circle, AOL conceded the broader point of our coalition—that AOL's would create a two-tiered Internet that leaves many behind with inferior service," said Adam Green, a spokesperson for MoveOn.org Civic Action.
This weekend, the San Jose Mercury News exposed this reality in an editorial entitled, "Paid e-mail will lead to separate, unequal systems; free systems will become neglected." It identified AOL's threat to the "free and open" Internet this way:
"The Internet giant announced that in the next 30 days it would launch a certified e-mail system that would guarantee delivery for e-mail senders who paid the equivalent of an electronic postage stamp. Those who don't pay could face a greater risk of having their mail tripped up by AOL's spam filters. ...
"[AOL's pay-to-send system] is likely to work as an incentive for AOL to move as many senders as possible to the paid system…the temptation would be to neglect the free e-mail system, whose reliability would decline. Eventually, everyone would migrate to the fee-based system. There would be no way around the AOL tollbooth. ...
"Why doesn't AOL announce it will forgo the fees -- a decision that would help silence critics? AOL won't say...The charge per e-mail is also worrisome. The costs of certifying a sender are largely fixed. So the only reason to keep charging a sender who's already been vetted is to turn e-mail into a cash cow.
Click here to read the full article.
"Perversely, AOL's pay-to-send system would actually reward AOL financially for degrading free email for regular customers as they attempt to push people into paid-mail," said Danny O'Brien, Activism Coordinator for the Electronic Frontier Foundation. "AOL should be working to ensure its spam filters don't block legitimate mail, not charging protection money to bypass those filters and offering band-aids to allow some select nonprofits to bypass them as well."
Last week, the coalition – representing over 15 million people combined – announced an "Open Letter To AOL" at www.DearAOL.com urging AOL not to implement an "email tax" that would harm Internet freedom. Over 500 organizations and 30,000 everyday Internet users have signed this letter. Coalition members include Craigslist founder Craig Newmark, the Association of Cancer Online Resources, the AFL-CIO, MoveOn.org Civic Action, Gun Owners of America, the Electronic Freedom Foundation, Free Press, and others.
"AOL's pay-to-send scheme threatens the free and open Internet as we know it," said Timothy Karr, campaign director of Free Press, a national, nonpartisan media reform organization. "The Internet needs to be a level playing field. The flow of online information, innovation and ideas is not a luxury to be sold off to the highest bidder."
The DearAOL.com Coalition is engaged in an ongoing large-scale public awareness campaign about the threat AOL's email tax poses to the free and open Internet. More information and a list of all coalition members are located at www.dearaol.com.
