News

The ruling is a mishmash of tired industry claims paired with a willful misrepresentation of how the internet actually works.

Free Press’ Mike Rispoli talks to Local News Matters about the need for trustworthy and accessible civic information.

Free Press’ Matt Wood said the ruling was “plainly wrong at every level of analysis.”

Consumer advocates warned that people could now be subject to higher fees or slowed or blocked services.

The flawed ruling does leave open the possibility of congressional action, however unlikely it may be in the next Congress.

The ruling will let the Trump administration abdicate its responsibility to protect internet users against unscrupulous business practices.

The 6th Circuit’s opinion on Net Neutrality protections is plainly wrong at every level of analysis.

The groups argue that the ban unjustifiably restricts Americans from accessing ideas, information, and media from abroad in violation of the First Amendment.

Free Press’ Yanni Chen tells CounterSpin why banning TikTok violates First Amendment freedoms.

What the court decides could have broad implications for speech online.